My screwdriver is dangerous. A gallon of water is dangerous. Politician are dangerous (the dictator governors of five states democide murdered more people than did 911 terrorists). "I do not add âwithin the limits of the lawâ; because law is often but the tyrantâs will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual." Thomas Jefferson
Riddle me this Robin: Since Caetano v Massachusetts recognized that 200,000 stun guns met the âin common useâ criteria; does that not throw the door completely open if NFA regulated firearms are possessed in numbers greater than 200,000? For example the AFTâs reclassification of pistols with stabilizing braces as being SBRs. The estimated number is 40 million. Donât they now qualify as being in common use thereby beyond the NFAâs regulatory authority? I venture to estimate that suppressors and machine guns each exceed 200,000 held by private citizens! Hasnât the AFT over expanded their authority to the point that they now lack jurisdiction? Mull that over!
And when "we" call firearms dangerous we should specify POTENTIALLY dangerous. My stored firearms as they are right now present no danger to anyone. Regardless of the type, design, caliber or capacity. It is only with intent or action from USER they they might pose a danger. The the same thing can be said of my vehicles, my cleaning supplies or even my carpentry tools. Let's start talking about potential or perceived danger versus actual danger.
Particularly dangerous. Important distinction there. I don't think people are generally advocating for general ownership of miniguns, surface to air missiles, or nukes.
US v Miller was a sham…. Neither the defendants nor their legal counsel appeared at the Supreme Court. And the court remanded the case to the District court for further proceedings, which never happened. Bad jurisprudence
Judge needs to be removed from the bench he is violating the Constitution overreach from the government and overreach from the court and the charger who is probably a liberal judge who doesn't care about the conversation or the Bill of Rights
She is looney tunes, should be disbarred as willfully disregarding the US constitution, No right of the government exists to limit commonly used firearms. You are voided and moot.
Hate to nit pic but you stated that weapons are "designed to be dangerous". I believe that is incorrect. Weapons are designed to be safe to the user and their purpose. Purpose is determined by the end user. Don't get me wrong I understand what you meant. I think I am writing because ATF and the assholes who have written the words "designed or redesigned etc" which is bullshit. Same crap about the brace designed to be strapped to arm and that it is redesigned if a person doesn't use it as the original designers vision was. All bullshit. Face it I know you are a lawyer but the ridiculousness of making definitions and changing them to suit the day of the week. Really? Hey tell me what the primary purpose of the Second Amendment is and how it could connect to lets say…………..a politician who is taking money as The Big Guy, allowing an invasion of our borders, putting and paying for a foreign country (lets say Ukraine) to be put ahead of people he swore to represent, obstructs and impairs foreign investigations through the use of US tax dollars and also swears he will do everything in his power to NOT uphold the US Constitution? What would be the practical and real application, not bullshit? Bet you won't LMAO.
Judges who don't follow the constitution should be removed from the bench and forfeit all pension and money's accumulated during tenure……gun groups should start suing them personally….
There are so few unusual weapons out there when one is a firearm enthusiast. Many people that are ignorant to types of firearms or is not a collector may be unaware of how common most firearms are.
Anyone ih this Country protecting the Construction?
Or they prefer dictatorship communism law?
I live in Illinois. Thank GOD I don't own any weapons!!
Idiots like this forget history or maybe history is not taught in college
My screwdriver is dangerous. A gallon of water is dangerous. Politician are dangerous (the dictator governors of five states democide murdered more people than did 911 terrorists).
"I do not add âwithin the limits of the lawâ; because law is often but the tyrantâs will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual." Thomas Jefferson
That idiot governor pritzker in Illinois needs to be abolished
Riddle me this Robin: Since Caetano v Massachusetts recognized that 200,000 stun guns met the âin common useâ criteria; does that not throw the door completely open if NFA regulated firearms are possessed in numbers greater than 200,000? For example the AFTâs reclassification of pistols with stabilizing braces as being SBRs. The estimated number is 40 million. Donât they now qualify as being in common use thereby beyond the NFAâs regulatory authority? I venture to estimate that suppressors and machine guns each exceed 200,000 held by private citizens! Hasnât the AFT over expanded their authority to the point that they now lack jurisdiction? Mull that over!
More like "When judges are paid off"!!!!!
The 9th circuit has been at it for years.
And when "we" call firearms dangerous we should specify POTENTIALLY dangerous. My stored firearms as they are right now present no danger to anyone. Regardless of the type, design, caliber or capacity. It is only with intent or action from USER they they might pose a danger. The the same thing can be said of my vehicles, my cleaning supplies or even my carpentry tools. Let's start talking about potential or perceived danger versus actual danger.
Particularly dangerous. Important distinction there. I don't think people are generally advocating for general ownership of miniguns, surface to air missiles, or nukes.
Judge Karen
US v Miller was a sham…. Neither the defendants nor their legal counsel appeared at the Supreme Court. And the court remanded the case to the District court for further proceedings, which never happened.
Bad jurisprudence
The fix – stop talking about "Constitutional Rights" and start acting on them. Until that happens, embrace the suck – even from the "good" guys.
When judges make decisions that side with arbitrary rules they are operating in poor conduct and should be immediately removed.
IL is a fascist state, and this Judge is completely wrong acting from ideology and not by the rule of law.
She just means , space guns
Judge needs to be removed from the bench he is violating the Constitution overreach from the government and overreach from the court and the charger who is probably a liberal judge who doesn't care about the conversation or the Bill of Rights
Let me ask you this? As a Marine Corps Veteran that trained in hand to hand combat and weapons training does that mean I'm banned?
She is looney tunes, should be disbarred as willfully disregarding the US constitution, No right of the government exists to limit commonly used firearms. You are voided and moot.
Hate to nit pic but you stated that weapons are "designed to be dangerous". I believe that is incorrect. Weapons are designed to be safe to the user and their purpose. Purpose is determined by the end user. Don't get me wrong I understand what you meant. I think I am writing because ATF and the assholes who have written the words "designed or redesigned etc" which is bullshit. Same crap about the brace designed to be strapped to arm and that it is redesigned if a person doesn't use it as the original designers vision was. All bullshit. Face it I know you are a lawyer but the ridiculousness of making definitions and changing them to suit the day of the week. Really? Hey tell me what the primary purpose of the Second Amendment is and how it could connect to lets say…………..a politician who is taking money as The Big Guy, allowing an invasion of our borders, putting and paying for a foreign country (lets say Ukraine) to be put ahead of people he swore to represent, obstructs and impairs foreign investigations through the use of US tax dollars and also swears he will do everything in his power to NOT uphold the US Constitution? What would be the practical and real application, not bullshit? Bet you won't LMAO.
Very good information
Judges who don't follow the constitution should be removed from the bench and forfeit all pension and money's accumulated during tenure……gun groups should start suing them personally….
I am so happy to have found your page. Keep up the great work.
The problem is we have judges and elected officials that are dangerous and unusual ! WAKE UP PEOPLE
There are so few unusual weapons out there when one is a firearm enthusiast. Many people that are ignorant to types of firearms or is not a collector may be unaware of how common most firearms are.
What is the text, history, and tradition that bars felons from self defense by banning their ownership of firearms?